Andriano,
Lattice Angelique A.
Reaction paper on People’s Forum on US Militarism and its Impacts on the Philippine Environment
Reaction paper on People’s Forum on US Militarism and its Impacts on the Philippine Environment
After several years
of debates, the US military base in Subic was finally closed in 1992. Now, as
if history is repeating itself, US troops are back as the Enhanced Defense
Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) was passed last Monday, 28 April 2014.
I
admit that EDCA has its strong points and will benefit our military if the
goals are met. However, compared to US we are at the losing end. A reason would
be the risk it poses to our environment which was the main concern at the
forum. Dr. Giovanni Tapang, a professor in the University and the chairperson
of the organization Agham at Teknolohiya Para sa Sambayanan, stressed that the
US military used the Subic waters as a toxic waste dump during their occupation
before and at the same time harming the health of the residents near the base.
He is concerned of what would happened if another ‘’accident’’ happened in our
seas like when the USS Guardian destroyed at least 1000 square meters of coral
reefs at the World Heritage Site Tubbataha reef. Should the Philippines just
ask for compensation again? But the US Navy has not paid—not even a cent after
more than a year!
Despite only making it to Dr.
Tapang’s talk, I understood why environmental advocates are strongly against US
occupation again because, although there is an environmental provision under
the EDCA, there is no guarantee that it will be strictly carried out like the
situation at Tubbataha. US troops can get away from harming our environment again.
After hearing the
forum and doing some research, I know that I’m against the agreement as well.
First is because of the issue on the environment that was discussed. Having the
US military exercises in the country will increase our toxic waste. Second, it
violates the constitution. From the news, I learned that the Senate was not
given the chance to let their voices out on this matter where in fact their
approval is needed for any treaty to be passed. Third, this agreement mimics
the situation before. They say that the important feature of the agreement is
that the US military are not allowed to construct new bases in the country
because they can only use existing AFP bases. However, they can still construct
infrastructures inside the bases! Another is the upgrade and construction of
two naval bases in Palawan which started late last year. Concerned officials
said it is part of AFP’s modernization program but I think this is for the US
military. A similar situation is happening in South Korea where their
government is constructing a military base in Jeju Island for the US military
which Dr. Tapang also mentioned in his talk. This “important feature” is just
going around the law that the US military can never build a base in the
Philippines again.
I’m all for our
country’s advancement but not through this agreement where there are many
loopholes. I still believe that things will work out for US and the Philippines
if only a true compromise is reached that’s favourable for both countries.
Sources:
Ayee, M. (2014, April
28). Miriam: PH-US deal unfair surprise on Senate. Rappler.
Depasupil, W. (2014,
March 6). DND to develop second naval facility in Palawan. The Manila Times.
Dulce, L. (2014,
April 24). Obama's visit and the 'toxic' legacy of US bases. Rappler.
Sabillo, K. (2012,
April 30). 5 things you need to know about EDCA. Inquirer.
No comments:
Post a Comment